Data Review

Data review is no longer just “submit and wait.” It involves distinct workspaces and responsibilities for authors, review members, and review admins. This page is organised as pre-submit steps → roles → review workspace → FAQ.

Before submission

Before sending data into review from My Data, complete two steps first:

1. Run Data check
2. Click Submit for review

If the platform finds blocking issues during submission, it opens a problem list. Fix those issues first, then submit again.

For process datasets, Submit for review first enters the Numerical stability gate. Common states include “Review submission is queued,” “Numerical stability gate is running,” “Review submission is waiting for the numerical stability gate to finish,” and “Numerical stability gate passed. Submitting for review now.” If the page says submission is still processing in the background, click Submit for review again later to refresh the latest status. If the gate blocks submission, fix the reported data issues, save again, and resubmit.

Who does what

Role	Primary responsibility	Main entry
Author	Model data, self-check, submit for review, revise after feedback	My Data
Review member (review-member)	Review assigned tasks and submit review comments	Avatar menu → Review Management
Review admin (review-admin)	Assign work, track progress, manage review members, approve or reject the full review	Avatar menu → Review Management
Team admin	Coordinate with authors and help track project progress	My Team, notification center

Review roles and team roles are different permission systems. A person may have both, or only one of them.

How to open the review workspace

Users with a review role can open Review Management from the avatar menu in the top-right corner.

This workspace is role-gated and does not stay visible in the left navigation for everyone.

The marked area 1 shows the tabs visible to the current account. This screenshot is a review-member example; a review-admin sees a different management-oriented tab set.

Review admin workspace

When a review-admin opens Review Management, the current tabs are:

• Unassigned Task
• Assigned Task
• Rejected Task
• Member Management

Unassigned Task

This is where newly submitted reviews are assigned to review members.

Typical actions include:

• Selecting multiple tasks in bulk
• Opening Select Reviewer
• Setting a review deadline
• Rejecting the review at the whole-task level

Use this tab first whenever a new submission still needs reviewer assignment.

Assigned Task

This tab is for monitoring already assigned work.

Review admins can typically:

• Check review progress
• Open Review Progress
• Add more reviewers to unfinished work
• Revoke reviewers that are still pending
• Approve or reject the whole review

Rejected Task

This tab stores tasks that were rejected at the review-admin level, making it easier to trace what needs to be revised or reassigned.

Member Management

Member Management is where the review team itself is maintained. Typical actions include:

• Adding review members
• Removing review members
• Promoting review-member to review-admin
• Demoting review-admin back to review-member
• Inspecting each member's pending and reviewed counts

Review member workspace

When a review-member opens Review Management, the current tabs are:

• Reviewed
• Pending Review
• Rejected

Pending Review

This is the main working area for review members. It lists the tasks currently assigned to the logged-in reviewer.

Common actions include:

• Opening task details
• Filling in review feedback
• Using Temporary Save to keep work in progress
• Using Save to submit the review result

The editing experience differs by object type:

• Process review is more form-oriented
• Model review typically combines graph views with a right-side information panel

Reviewed

This tab shows tasks that the current review member has already processed.

Rejected

This tab is mainly for tasks that were rejected at the review-admin level.

If a task appears here, it usually means the whole review flow was rejected, not just that an individual reviewer wrote a negative comment.

What authors should know

Even if an author does not have a review role, they should still understand the review rhythm:

1. Finish modelling and self-check in My Data
2. Click Submit for review
   • If submission creates a background task, track it in the top-right Task Center before waiting for assignment or feedback.
3. Wait for a review admin to assign reviewers
4. Revise according to review feedback
5. Resubmit if necessary

Also watch the Data Notifications tab in the top-right notification center so that review feedback is not missed.

Status filters

Review-related lists commonly include status filters to help locate items at different stages.

In practice, interpret those statuses through your role:

• Authors care whether they must revise something
• Review members care which tasks are still pending
• Review admins care which tasks are unassigned or stuck

FAQ

Why can’t I see Review Management?

Because the entry is shown only to review-admin and review-member. Regular authors can submit for review without having access to the review workspace itself.

Why did submission not immediately become an active review?

Submission only enters the workflow. A review admin usually still needs to assign reviewers before the real review work begins.

I am a team admin. Why do I still not see Review Management?

Because team administration and review roles are separate permission domains.

Where can I compare all of these permissions quickly?

Continue with Permissions & Data Spaces.